Archive for June, 2006

Friday June 30, 2006

Posted in Thought on 30 June 2006 by Johnny

On a report from the Pentagon that five American troops in Iraq are under investigation for raping an Iraqi woman and killing her family (I’ll get a transcript later):

“What I didn’t see in the report is how 155,000 soldiers weren’t killing or raping anyone.” — Melanie Morgan, SF conservative radio host on MSNBC’s Hardball

No, dude, seriously. I just heard it myself. Now she’s going after the other guys in the outfit that made the accusation because it happened in a counseling session.

Then there was Mark Levin (NYC radio host) who managed to make the startling assessment last night that the balance of powers between the three branches was grievously out of whack: saying that the president doesn’t have enough power. He then went on a tirade that I could only describe as neo-fascist. I don’t even remember it all … it was staggering. He made Sean Hannity sound like a calm, reasonable moderate. He came rather close to suggesting that we start rounding up liberals and throwing them in Guantanamo Bay before getting a hold of himself. As legions of fans called in to support him, I remembered thinking that this is what it must have been like to listen to Hitler and his ilk in the 1920s. Nazis clothed themselves in patriotism and didn’t sound that far out of the mainstream — until they were able to seize complete power.

A majority of Republicans are not like this. However, as the right wing seeks to grill their fellow partisans for not being extreme enough, there is a great danger of radicalization, especially if there is another terrorist attack on America or the economy were to suffer a severe downturn. Let’s call it … a V for Vendetta scenario. The non-fiction version, however, might be far less dramatic — and you might not even notice it until it’s too late.

Thursday June 29, 2006

Posted in News on 29 June 2006 by Johnny

City council members in Buffalo, NY — apparently a charming hamlet with a roaring economy, zero crime, and no other remotely serious problems — are considering legislation to ban modified stereo systems in automobiles within the city limits. You heard right. There are so many different ways to question, mock, and discredit this insanity, but this link does all of it for me. (It’s short. Read it.)

Tuesday June 27, 2006

Posted in News on 27 June 2006 by Johnny

Ben Stein, famed actor/economist, notes in the allegedly treasonous New York Times that, by 2025, government Treasuries will achieve junk bond status, due to the ridiculously unsustainable twin deficits (budget and trade) that I’ve been rambling about for some time now. Translation: the financial community will soon regard the United States as a Third World country because the long-term fiscal forecast is *that* bad. As a result, foreigners will only lend money to our government if they are promised ridiculously high interest rates. What does this mean for America twenty years hence?

(1) Your taxes will be at least twice what they are now to cover interest payments on the national debt.
(2) The price of everything will be at least three times what it is now as the federal government will surely try and print more money to “fix” the problem (and by extension screw the rest of us over).
(3) You won’t be able to borrow any money, so there will be no more credit cards and virtually no one will be able to buy a house or a car.
(4) If you work for an American company, you’ll lose your job because all of the company’s domestic currency will be virtually worthless.
(5) Your savings will also be worthless, so plan on working until the day you die.
(6) The government will not be able to save you because it will be in worse shape than you.

Bottom line: Convert all your savings to gold and start hoarding or get out of the country while you still can.

Of course, Mr. Game Show Host blows it at the end by arguing that we need higher taxes. (For perspective, this is an arch-conservative we’re talking about here.) That, however, would only postpone the crisis for a few years. The main problem is Social Security and Medicare, the sacred idols upon which our politicians prostrate themselves. Over the next fifty years, the government will literally owe more than our nation is worth. In other words, if we as a nation held a giant auction for the world and sold every piece of real estate, every computer, every airplane, every everything to the highest bidder, we still wouldn’t be able to pay out Social Security and Medicare benefits (let alone the rest of government expenditures). That’s called bankruptcy — and we’re gonna be there within thirty years or so, if not sooner. The current crop of politicians will be dead or senile (if they’re not there already) and we’ll be the ones to face the music.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. If the United States wishes to continue existing, it has to eliminate Social Security and Medicare. Of course, given the selfishness and idiocy of the American public, combined with the cowardice and pandering nature of those in Washington, I’m not counting on it. That’s why I don’t plan on being here when all hell breaks loose.

Monday June 26, 2006

Posted in News on 26 June 2006 by Johnny

Item 1: Following the disclosure by the New York Times of the government’s wholesale surveillance of international financial transactions, Bush & Cheney both made empassioned speeches claiming that making this information public harms the war on terror (in some unknown way) and Rep. Peter King (R-NY) has now called for prosecuting the newspaper for such activities. Hmmm. A Republican president and his cronies, seeking to slice and dice the Constitution, proclaim that the NYT was harming national security by actually telling the populace what is going on. This seems familiar …

… Is this for real? Has the political discourse stooped to having to defend freedom of the press — which is IN THE FUCKING CONSTITUTION — as not being treason?

Item 2: The Department of Homeland Security has a series of hotlines that allow them to communicate directly with any or all of the nation’s fifty governors in the event of a national emergency. Imagine Gov. Ruth Ann Minner’s (D-DE) surprise when she began receiving calls from telemarketers on her “secure” hotline! Oops. Not only were the lines not at all secure, but DHS neglected to even place them on the National Do Not Call list. The department had — huge surprise — no comment.

Sunday June 25, 2006

Posted in News on 25 June 2006 by Johnny

… but has anyone noticed that North Korea is preparing to launch an ICBM? And that we’re considering bombing their launch site to stop them? Enjoy.

Saturday June 24, 2006

Posted in News on 24 June 2006 by Johnny

Don Goldwater is a Republican candidate for Arizona governor. He also happens to be the nephew of Barry Goldwater — Senator, 1964 Republican nominee for president, and the last actual limited-government candidate to run for national office. Regardless, he has thrown gasoline on the already insanely heated debate over illegal immigrants by “call[ing] for the creation of forced labor camps” instead of incarcerating or deporting them, using them “as labor in the construction of a wall and [to] clean the areas of the Arizona desert that they’re polluting.”

The perfect retort kinda wrote itself:

If we’re going to crack down on illegals and arrest them, we shouldn’t just send them to some prison cell and let them live off the taxpayers. We should make them earn their keep: Have them do construction work, pick crops, wash dishes, and so forth.

Oh, wait…

Friday June 23, 2006

Posted in News on 23 June 2006 by Johnny

Today’s headline: The Bush Administration has been covertly watching international financial transactions without permission of the banks, or Congress, or a judge.

Good gravy. I feel like we need to erect a government abuse scoreboard. File this under “I’m shocked – SHOCKED – to find gambling going on in this establishment!”

Thursday June 22, 2006

Posted in News on 22 June 2006 by Johnny

NYC councilman Joel Rivera has proposed using zoning laws to limit fast food restaurants in the city, saying that we need to do it for the children blah blah blah.

Why? Well, according to his CNBC interview, “People don’t have enough choices.” That’s right, folks: there’s not enough restaurant options in New York City. Wow.

UPDATE (8pm): And then there’s Sen. Rick Santorum (Army of Satan-PA), who stood up on the floor of the Senate and announced that the War in Iraq was really worth it, after all, because WE HAVE FOUND WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.

Okay. One problem. The WMDs were 500 abandoned mustard gas canisters that were left over from the Iran-Iraq war, which ended back in 1988. On top of that … the chemicals had degraded to the point where the worst it could do would be to give you a rash if you reached out and touched it. Well. Now I’m scared.

Hell, even Fox News’ left-wing patsy Alan Colmes was able to thoroughly embarass the Senator on the show where Sean Hannity allows him to sit at his anchor desk.

This reeks of desperation, as Santorum is, mercifully, down 18 points in recent polls in Pennsylvania. Thank goodness that this man will be out of power.

Monday June 19, 2006

Posted in News on 19 June 2006 by Johnny

(1) Stanley Cup Finals, Game 7. Edmonton at Carolina. Good stuff.

(2) Slate picks apart the 8000th incidence of media hysteria this year.

(3) Current TV, a little-known network that was started by none other than Internet-inventor Al Gore as an off-the-wall, we’ll-put-anything-you-film-on-the-air, allegedly-21st-century news channel has an animated news satire bit called SuperNews. It started out as a one-note Bush-basher vehicle, but then … it actually started getting funny. Sometimes. (Clearly, Gore is not on the writing team.) The two best: “Iran: Deal or No Deal” and “The Great Immigration Debate of 1621.”

(4) If you’re going to advocate hanging the Ten Commandments in courthouses … know more than three of them. Stephen Colbert skewers Rep. Westmoreland.

(5) While a bit more extreme than I would be willing to go, one of my favorite bloggers hammers home a very important point: the immigration debate would be far different if the illegals were white. Does anyone really care to debate this point? Can some explain how Latinos are unraveling the fabric of our society? They are working and contributing to Social Security (insert obligatory libertarian rant about how government pensions are an illegal and immoral pyramid scheme here). They’re learning English faster than previous groups of immigrants. Legalize anyone who wants to work here as long as they actually work and be done with the over-the-top hand-wringing.

UPDATE (11pm): ‘CANES WIN THE CUP! It’s the first professional sports championship for one of my adopted home states. The Stanley Cup is going down to Tobacco Road, of all places. (Hey, it can’t be weirder than Tampa, which is where it went when the Lightning won it all two years ago.) Cam Ward, Carolina’s goalie (a rookie, no less!), wins the Smythe Trophy as the MVP of the playoffs. Outstanding hockey game. Cue the confetti for the parade down Hillsborough Street. . . .

Wait: In ACC basketball country?

Raleigh Frickin’ North Carolina!

As for Cleveland? Nah. Never.

Saturday June 17, 2006

Posted in Thought on 17 June 2006 by Johnny

It’s not the most cheerful of days for me, or any of us, today.

One of the central tenets of 20th century jurisprudence is the “exclusionary rule.” Unless you’re a legal junkie, you wouldn’t know what that is off-hand, but you know its implications if you’ve ever watched an episode of Law & Order. If the police conduct a search of a suspect’s property that is not legal, then any evidence against the suspect found as a result of that illegal search cannot be used against the suspect at trial. This is clear as day and incredibly obvious, otherwise the police would have every incentive to violate citizens’ Constitutional protections if the worst that could happen to the officers would be a judge wagging his or her finger at them.

Well, the exclusionary rule is now out the window. In a 5-4 decision Thursday, the Supreme Court decided that a search where the police did not knock at the door before breaking it down — a tenet of our legal system from our nation’s inception, dating back to 13th century English common law — was indeed unconstitutional, but that the exclusionary rule (for some unknown reason) did not apply and, therefore, the evidence against the suspect could be used against him, even though the search was illegal. Justice Sam Alito voted with the majority, while the woman he replaced (Sandra Day O’Connor) likely would have voted the other way.

While the exclusionary rule remains on the books as a judicial precedent, it could now perhaps be stricken if another lawsuit on a similar topic makes its way back to the high court. As frightening as the Bush Administration’s myriad infringements of our civil rights is — and from the Patriot Act to NSA wiretapping, what a list! — this could absolutely destroy the fabric of American society. Your local police force, or the FBI, or any government agency may well soon have the ability to search your house for any reason at any time with complete impunity. For some reason, the majority opinion (written by the unabashedly statist Justice Scalia) seemed to think this would not be a problem, since the nation’s police forces are now a professional bunch that are beyond corruption or reproach. Um, okay.

The United States would become a police state in the most literal sense of the word if the exclusionary rule were invalidated. We’re halfway there, boys and girls.

On the much cheerier side, there’s North Carolina winning an epic 13-inning marathon to start off their trip to the College World Series on a positive note. Go Heels!